Mininni v. New York City Employees' Retirement System

279 A.D.2d 428, 719 N.Y.S.2d 853, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 881
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 30, 2001
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 279 A.D.2d 428 (Mininni v. New York City Employees' Retirement System) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mininni v. New York City Employees' Retirement System, 279 A.D.2d 428, 719 N.Y.S.2d 853, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 881 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered September 23, 1999, which dismissed the petition brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul respondents’ determination, dated December 10, 1998, denying petitioner’s application for disability retirement benefits, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The Medical Board’s finding that petitioner is not disabled may not be judicially disturbed since it is supported by some credible evidence, including its own examinations of petitioner (see, Matter of Borenstein v New York City Employees’ Retirement Sys., 88 NY2d 756, 761; Matter of Bell v New York City Employees’ Retirement Sys., 273 AD2d 119; Matter of DeNaro v [429]*429New York City Employees’ Retirement Sys., 265 AD2d 215, lv denied 95 NY2d 769; Matter of Reid v Kelly, 235 AD2d 361). While the medical evidence reviewed by the Medical Board was subject to conflicting interpretations, the Board alone had the authority to resolve such conflicts (see Matter of DeNaro, supra-, Matter of Reid, supra). Petitioner’s contention that the Board failed to consider the substantial evidence of his disability is not supported by the record. Concur — Williams, J. P., Mazzarelli, Lerner, Rubin and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Fusco v. Teachers' Retirement Sys. of the City of New York
136 A.D.3d 450 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
279 A.D.2d 428, 719 N.Y.S.2d 853, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mininni-v-new-york-city-employees-retirement-system-nyappdiv-2001.