Mingo v. City of Detroit

762 N.W.2d 504, 483 Mich. 917
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 23, 2009
Docket136982
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 762 N.W.2d 504 (Mingo v. City of Detroit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mingo v. City of Detroit, 762 N.W.2d 504, 483 Mich. 917 (Mich. 2009).

Opinion

762 N.W.2d 504 (2009)

Gwendolyn MINGO, Citizens of Brush Park, Reverend Mary Gause, Warren Gaither, Dorothy Robinson, Marcia Burnette Nichols, Patty Burnette Jones, and Andrew J. Burnette, Jr., Plaintiffs-Appellants, and
Brush Park Citizens District Council, Keith Noble, Leon Thomas, Ruth Diggs, Quentin Mingo, Ernestine Noble, Deacon Leon Thomas, Marilyn Reed, Grace Davis, Dr. Barbara Womack, Faye Davis, Mabel Nora, Reverend Velma Rosemund, Douglas Fuller, Frank Fuller, Annie Jackson, Nathaniel Jackson, and Reverend Ora Marie Clay, Plaintiffs,
v.
CITY OF DETROIT, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 136982, COA No. 277403.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

March 23, 2009.

Order

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's November 25, 2008 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Thomas
762 N.W.2d 504 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
762 N.W.2d 504, 483 Mich. 917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mingo-v-city-of-detroit-mich-2009.