Mingo v. City of Detroit
757 N.W.2d 443, 482 Mich. 1066
Opinion
Gwendolyn MINGO, Citizens of Brush Park, Reverend Mary Gause, Warren Gaither, Dorothy Robinson, Marcia Burnette Nichols, Patty Burnette Jones, and Andrew J. Burnette, Jr., Plaintiffs-Appellants, and
Brush Park Citizens District Council, Keith Noble, Leon Thomas, Ruth Diggs, Quentin Mingo, Ernestine Noble, Deacon Leon Thomas, Marilyn Reed, Grace Davis, Dr. Barbara Womack, Faye Davis, Mabel Nora, Reverend Velma Rosemund, Douglas Fuller, Frank Fuller, Annie Jackson, Nathaniel Jackson, and Reverend Ora Marie Clay, Plaintiffs,
v.
CITY OF DETROIT, Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 17, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mingo v. City of Detroit, 757 N.W.2d 443, 482 Mich. 1066 (Mich. 2008).
757 N.W.2d 443 (Mingo v. City of Detroit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Collins v. Department of Corrections
757 N.W.2d 443 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2008)