Mingo v. City of Detroit
757 N.W.2d 443, 482 Mich. 1066
This text of 757 N.W.2d 443 (Mingo v. City of Detroit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mingo v. City of Detroit, 757 N.W.2d 443, 482 Mich. 1066 (Mich. 2008).
Opinion
Gwendolyn MINGO, Citizens of Brush Park, Reverend Mary Gause, Warren Gaither, Dorothy Robinson, Marcia Burnette Nichols, Patty Burnette Jones, and Andrew J. Burnette, Jr., Plaintiffs-Appellants, and
Brush Park Citizens District Council, Keith Noble, Leon Thomas, Ruth Diggs, Quentin Mingo, Ernestine Noble, Deacon Leon Thomas, Marilyn Reed, Grace Davis, Dr. Barbara Womack, Faye Davis, Mabel Nora, Reverend Velma Rosemund, Douglas Fuller, Frank Fuller, Annie Jackson, Nathaniel Jackson, and Reverend Ora Marie Clay, Plaintiffs,
v.
CITY OF DETROIT, Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 17, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Collins v. Department of Corrections
757 N.W.2d 443 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2008)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
757 N.W.2d 443, 482 Mich. 1066, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mingo-v-city-of-detroit-mich-2008.