Mincey v. State

789 So. 2d 492, 2001 WL 766257
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 10, 2001·No. 1D01-1963·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

789 So.2d 492 (2001)

David MINCEY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D01-1963.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 10, 2001.

Davis Mincey, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. There is no authority for filing a motion for rehearing of an order disposing of a motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. Griffis v. State, 593 So.2d 308 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). The motion for rehearing filed below did not toll the time for filing a notice of appeal. Because the notice of appeal was filed on March 14, 2001, it was untimely to seek review of the January 29, 2001, order. Fla. R.App. P. 9.110(b). Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal.

DISMISSED.

BARFIELD, DAVIS and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mincey v. State, 789 So. 2d 492, 2001 WL 766257 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

789 So. 2d 492 (Mincey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
886 So. 2d 197 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)
Bridges v. State
863 So. 2d 366 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
State v. McBride
848 So. 2d 287 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)
Johnson v. State
840 So. 2d 1164 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)