Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation v. Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A.

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedMay 14, 2024
Docket1:24-cv-00870
StatusUnknown

This text of Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation v. Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A. (Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation v. Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation v. Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A., (S.D.N.Y. 2024).

Opinion

USONUITTEHDE RSTNA DTIESST RDIICSTT ROIFC TN ECWOU YROTR K ----------------------------------------------------------X : MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL, : CORPORATION, : : Plaintiff, : 24-CV-870 (VSB) : -against- : ORDER : MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY : S.A., : : Defendant. : : --------------------------------------------------------- X

VERNON S. BRODERICK, United States District Judge: On February 6, 2024, Plaintiff filed this action against Defendant. (Doc. 1.) To date, Plaintiff has not filed a request for an issuance of summons, an affidavit of service, or taken any other action to prosecute this case. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that, no later than May 24, 2024, Plaintiff shall submit a letter of no more than three (3) pages, supported by legal authority, demonstrating good cause as to why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). “Good cause is generally found only in exceptional circumstances where the plaintiff's failure to serve process in a timely manner was the result of circumstances beyond its control.” E. Refractories Co. v. Forty Eight Insulations, Inc., 187 F.R.D. 503, 505 (S.D.N.Y. 1999) (internal quotation marks omitted). “District courts consider the diligence of plaintiff's efforts to effect proper service and any prejudice suffered by the defendant as a consequence of the delay.” Id. (internal quotation marks omitted). “An attorney’s inadvertence, neglect, mistake or misplaced reliance does not constitute good cause.” Howard v. Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler, 977 F.Supp. 654, 658 (S.D.N.Y.1997) (citing McGregor v. United States, 933 F.2d 156, 160 (2d Cir.1991), aff’d, 173 F.3d 844 (2d Cir.1999)). Plaintiff is warned that failure to submit a letter and to demonstrate good cause for failure to serve Defendant within ninety days after the complaint was filed will result in dismissal of this action. SO ORDERED. Dated: May 14, 2024 Aree LY ee fs New York, New York LAA U4 I1dG VERNON S. BRODERICK United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation v. Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/milwaukee-electric-tool-corporation-v-mediterranean-shipping-company-sa-nysd-2024.