Milton v. State

467 So. 2d 837, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1088, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13745
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Milton v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14379
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 30, 1985·No. No. 85-709·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We find that only one of the defendant’s points merits discussion and reversal. It is argued by the defendant that the lower court improperly imposed four consecutive three-year minimum mandatory sentences. See Palmer v. State, 438 So.2d 1 (Fla.1983). This court cannot determine on the record before us whether or not the convictions involved here arose out of the same criminal transaction. Accordingly, we reverse and remand this matter to the trial court for the purpose of attaching portions of the record which would demonstrate that the dictates of Palmer have been complied with, or to modify the consecutive minimum mandatory sentences to conform to the law as announced in Palmer if necessary.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Milton v. State, 467 So. 2d 837, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1088, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13745 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

467 So. 2d 837 (Milton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Palmer v. State
438 So. 2d 1 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)