Milton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Milton v. State

415 So. 2d 769, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20107

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Milton v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14379 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 25, 1982·No. No. 81-1323·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of his convictions of two counts of robbery using a firearm, unlawful display of a firearm, and two counts of burglary. The remaining eighteen counts of a similar nature charged in the information were severed and appellant was tried on only the above five counts.

Appellant is urging reversal upon the ground that the trial court erred in permitting the introduction of evidence of numerous other collateral crimes for the purpose of establishing the identity of appellant.

We have considered appellant’s point on appeal in the light of the record and briefs, and have concluded that no reversible error has been demonstrated. Ruffin v. State, 397 So.2d 277 (Fla.1981), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 368, 70 L.Ed.2d 194 (1981); Williams v. State, 110 So.2d 654 (Fla.1959), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 847, 80 S.Ct. 102, 4 L.Ed.2d 86 (1959). Therefore the judgment and sentences are affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of his convictions of two counts of robbery using a firearm, unlawful display of a firearm, and two counts of burglary. The remaining eighteen counts of a similar nature charged in the information were severed and appellant was tried on only the above five counts.

Appellant is urging reversal upon the ground that the trial court erred in permitting the introduction of evidence of numerous other collateral crimes for the purpose of establishing the identity of appellant.

We have considered appellant’s point on appeal in the light of the record and briefs, and have concluded that no reversible error has been demonstrated. Ruffin v. State, 397 So.2d 277 (Fla.1981), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 368, 70 L.Ed.2d 194 (1981); Williams v. State, 110 So.2d 654 (Fla.1959), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 847, 80 S.Ct. 102, 4 L.Ed.2d 86 (1959). Therefore the judgment and sentences are affirmed.

Affirmed.

Milton v. State, 415 So. 2d 769, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20107 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

415 So. 2d 769 (Milton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related