Milton v. Burwell
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-8096
EDWIN MILTON; RASHAD FRAIERSON,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
MISS BURWELL, Treatment Counselor; MISS FIELDS, TPS Supervisor; MR. G. BUGG, Grievance Coordinator; WILLIAMS, Assistant Warden; PONTON, Warden; CHARLENE DAVIS, Regional Director,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:09-cv-01074-CMH-IDD)
Submitted: June 14, 2010 Decided: June 30, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edwin Milton, Rashad Fraierson, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Edwin Milton and Rashad Fraierson appeal the district
court’s order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Milton v. Burwell, No. 1:09-cv-01074-CMH-IDD
(E.D. Va. Oct. 15, 2009). We deny Appellants’ motion to compel.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Milton v. Burwell (Milton v. Burwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.