Milton v. Burwell

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 30, 2010·No. 09-8096·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8096

EDWIN MILTON; RASHAD FRAIERSON,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

MISS BURWELL, Treatment Counselor; MISS FIELDS, TPS Supervisor; MR. G. BUGG, Grievance Coordinator; WILLIAMS, Assistant Warden; PONTON, Warden; CHARLENE DAVIS, Regional Director,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:09-cv-01074-CMH-IDD)

Submitted: June 14, 2010 Decided: June 30, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edwin Milton, Rashad Fraierson, Appellants Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Edwin Milton and Rashad Fraierson appeal the district

court’s order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)

complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Milton v. Burwell, No. 1:09-cv-01074-CMH-IDD

(E.D. Va. Oct. 15, 2009). We deny Appellants’ motion to compel.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Milton v. Burwell, (4th Cir. 2010).

Milton v. Burwell (Milton v. Burwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related