Milton v. Burwell

Fourth Circuit

Milton v. Burwell

386 F. App'x 453

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 30, 2010·No. No. 09-8096·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Edwin Milton and Rashad Fraierson appeal the district court’s order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Milton v. Burwell, No. 1:09-cv-01074-CMH-IDD, 2009 WL 3378664 (E.D.Va. Oct. 15, 2009). We deny Appellants’ motion to compel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Edwin Milton and Rashad Fraierson appeal the district court’s order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Milton v. Burwell, No. 1:09-cv-01074-CMH-IDD, 2009 WL 3378664 (E.D.Va. Oct. 15, 2009). We deny Appellants’ motion to compel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Milton v. Burwell, 386 F. App'x 453 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

386 F. App'x 453 (Milton v. Burwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related