Milpac Dyeing Co. v. B & B Sweater Mills, Inc.

28 Misc. 2d 548, 208 N.Y.S.2d 109, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2114
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedDecember 1, 1960
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 28 Misc. 2d 548 (Milpac Dyeing Co. v. B & B Sweater Mills, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Milpac Dyeing Co. v. B & B Sweater Mills, Inc., 28 Misc. 2d 548, 208 N.Y.S.2d 109, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2114 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The stipulation of discontinuance made in open court before a Justice thereof, consented to by defendant’s president and entered on the record by the official stenographer, terminated the action and the court was thereafter without power to summarily vacate the stipulation (Lowell Adams Discount Co. v. Carter, 5 Misc 2d 562 ; Boericke & Tafel v. Gold, 88 N. Y. S. 2d 726).

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion denied.

Concur—Hecht, J. P., Stbuer and Timer, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Phoenix Assurance Co. v. Stark Mobile Homes, Inc.
39 A.D.2d 514 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 Misc. 2d 548, 208 N.Y.S.2d 109, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/milpac-dyeing-co-v-b-b-sweater-mills-inc-nyappterm-1960.