Lowell Adams Discount Co. v. Carter
Opinion
After the entry of judgment by plaintiff, as a result of defendant’s failure to answer, the parties entered into a written stipulation in which defendant conceded liability and agreed to settle the controversy on specific terms. The granting of defendant’s motion to open the default, long after the execution of said stipulation, was improper since the relief afforded defendant ignored the stipulation and in effect set it aside. The Municipal Court lacks jurisdiction to set aside a stipulation made between parties in settlement of a controversy (Boericke & Tafel v. Gold, 88 N. Y. S. 2d 726; Equitable Trust Co. v. MacLaire, 77 Misc. 116).
The order should be reversed, with $10 costs and, motion denied.
Eder, Heoht and Tilzer, JJ., concur.
Order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
5 Misc. 2d 562 (Lowell Adams Discount Co. v. Carter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.