Mills v. State

53 S.W.2d 610, 1932 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 848
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mills v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 123 Tex. Crim. 395
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 19, 1932·No. No. 15469·Published

Opinion

CADHOUN, J.

The offense, possessing a still for the manufacture of intoxicating liquor; the punishment, one year in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No defect either in the indictment or procedure has been pointed out or has been perceived. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM,

The'foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the 'Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mills v. State, 53 S.W.2d 610, 1932 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 848 (Tex. 1932).

53 S.W.2d 610 (Mills v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.