Mills v. State

765 So. 2d 153, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8001, 2000 WL 826303
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 28, 2000·No. No. 2D99-2181·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Katharthur Mills appeals his convictions and sentences for burglary of a dwelling and grand theft. We affirm the judgments and sentences but remand for correction of a scrivener’s error. The trial court announced that it was sentencing Mr. Mills as a violent career criminal. The sentencing documents, however, indicate that Mr. Mills was sentenced as a habitual violent felony offender. This should be corrected on remand to reflect that Mr. Mills was sentenced as a violent career criminal. See Bogan v. State, 462 So.2d 115 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985) (holding that written sentence must conform to oral pronouncement).

Affirmed; remanded for correction of scrivener’s error.

PARKER, A.C.J., and BLUE and GREEN, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mills v. State, 765 So. 2d 153, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8001, 2000 WL 826303 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

765 So. 2d 153 (Mills v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. State
902 So. 2d 340 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)