Mills v. State
Opinion
Katharthur Mills appeals his convictions and sentences for burglary of a dwelling and grand theft. We affirm the judgments and sentences but remand for correction of a scrivener’s error. The trial court announced that it was sentencing Mr. Mills as a violent career criminal. The sentencing documents, however, indicate that Mr. Mills was sentenced as a habitual violent felony offender. This should be corrected on remand to reflect that Mr. Mills was sentenced as a violent career criminal. See Bogan v. State, 462 So.2d 115 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985) (holding that written sentence must conform to oral pronouncement).
Affirmed; remanded for correction of scrivener’s error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
765 So. 2d 153 (Mills v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.