Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Mills v. State

Mills v. State

760 So. 2d 251, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6533, 2000 WL 689639
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mills v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 773 So. 2d 650 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 31, 2000·No. No. 2D99-2182·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Katharthur Mills appeals his conviction and sentence for burglary of a dwelling and petit theft committed on September 12, 1998. We affirm Mr. Mills’ judgment and sentence, except that we remand for the trial court to correct a scrivener’s error on the written judgment. The oral sentence imposed on Mills was a forty-year sentence with a thirty-year minimum mandatory as a violent career criminal. However, in the written judgment and sentence, the court mistakenly marked the sentence as a habitual violent felony offender sentence, instead of a violent career criminal sentence. This should be corrected upon remand.

Affirmed in part; remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND, and GREEN, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mills v. State, 760 So. 2d 251, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6533, 2000 WL 689639 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

760 So. 2d 251 (Mills v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.