Mills v. Cowgill
This text of 104 N.E. 529 (Mills v. Cowgill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was an action in assumpit by appellants for the balance of deposits made by them in the Bank of North Manchester, a copartnership, of which appellees are the only living members within service of the court. Every question properly presented by the briefs in this case is decided adversely to appellants’ contention in the ease of Hornaday v. Cowgill (1913), 54 Ind. App. 631, 101 N. E. 1030. On the authority of that case the judgment in this case is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
104 N.E. 529, 56 Ind. App. 707, 1914 Ind. App. LEXIS 86, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mills-v-cowgill-indctapp-1914.