Milligan v. Denham
This text of 563 N.E.2d 595 (Milligan v. Denham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this will contest action, which was timely filed except for the claim that separate service by the sheriff was not achieved pursuant to Ind. Code § 29-1-7-18, the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s dismissal. Milligan v. Denham (1990), Ind.App., 553 N.E.2d 1265. The petition to transfer, and the dissenting opinion of Chief Judge Ratliff, argue that the decision of the Court of Appeals is in conflict with Willman v. Railing (1988), Ind.App., 529 N.E.2d 122. We grant transfer to resolve this dispute.
Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 11(B)(3), we expressly adopt and incorporate by reference the opinion of the Court of Appeals in the present case.
Transfer is granted and this cause is remanded to the trial court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
563 N.E.2d 595, 1990 Ind. LEXIS 251, 1990 WL 204312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/milligan-v-denham-ind-1990.