Milligan v. Denham

563 N.E.2d 595, 1990 Ind. LEXIS 251, 1990 WL 204312
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided December 12, 1990·No. No. 63S01-9012-CV-775·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this will contest action, which was timely filed except for the claim that separate service by the sheriff was not achieved pursuant to Ind. Code § 29-1-7-18, the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s dismissal. Milligan v. Denham (1990), Ind.App., 553 N.E.2d 1265. The petition to transfer, and the dissenting opinion of Chief Judge Ratliff, argue that the decision of the Court of Appeals is in conflict with Willman v. Railing (1988), Ind.App., 529 N.E.2d 122. We grant transfer to resolve this dispute.

Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 11(B)(3), we expressly adopt and incorporate by reference the opinion of the Court of Appeals in the present case.

Transfer is granted and this cause is remanded to the trial court.

SHEPARD, C.J., and DeBRULER, PIVARNIK and DICKSON, JJ., concur. GIVAN, J., dissents without opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Milligan v. Denham, 563 N.E.2d 595, 1990 Ind. LEXIS 251, 1990 WL 204312 (Ind. 1990).

563 N.E.2d 595 (Milligan v. Denham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roger S. Blackman v. Karen A. Gholson and James W. Blackman
46 N.E.3d 975 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2015)
Johnson v. Morgan
871 N.E.2d 1050 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2007)
Willman v. Railing
571 N.E.2d 590 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1991)