Miller v. Universal Pictures Co.
10 N.Y.2d 972
Opinions
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the Per Curiam opinion in the Appellate Division.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Van Voorhis and Foster; Judge Burke dissents in the following opinion in which Judges Fuld and Froessel concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miller v. Universal Pictures Co., 10 N.Y.2d 972 (N.Y. 1961).
10 N.Y.2d 972 (Miller v. Universal Pictures Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Central Trust Co.
159 A.D.2d 997 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Gee v. CBS, INC.
471 F. Supp. 600 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1979)
Price v. Worldvision Enterprises, Inc.
455 F. Supp. 252 (S.D. New York, 1978)
Memphis Development Foundation v. Factors, Etc., Inc.
441 F. Supp. 1323 (W.D. Tennessee, 1977)
Shaw v. Time-Life Records
341 N.E.2d 817 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
Price v. Hal Roach Studios, Inc.
400 F. Supp. 836 (S.D. New York, 1975)
Davis v. Trans World Airlines
297 F. Supp. 1145 (C.D. California, 1969)
Krisel v. Duran
258 F. Supp. 845 (S.D. New York, 1966)