Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Metropolitan Opera Ass'n v. Wagner-Nichols Recorder Corp.

Metropolitan Opera Ass'n v. Wagner-Nichols Recorder Corp.

279 A.D. 632, 107 N.Y.S.2d 795
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 7, 1951
StatusPublished
Cited by117 cases

This text of 279 A.D. 632 (Metropolitan Opera Ass'n v. Wagner-Nichols Recorder Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Metropolitan Opera Ass'n v. Wagner-Nichols Recorder Corp., 279 A.D. 632, 107 N.Y.S.2d 795 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The Special Term was right in holding that the complaint sets forth a single cause of action in which Metropolitan Opera Association, Inc., and American Broadcasting Company, Inc., might properly join in asserting common rights. The court likewise was authorized in granting permission to Columbia Records, Inc., to intervene as a party plaintiff.

Defendants’ acts, as alleged in the complaint, constitute a misappropriation of the work, skill, expenditure and good will of plaintiffs, and present a ease of unfair competition. Moreover, upon this record, these property interests of plaintiffs are entitled to protection by injunction pendente lite against acts of infringement induced by defendants’ unfair course of business (International News Service v. Associated Press, 248 U. S. 215; Fisher v. Star Co., 231 N. Y. 414; Madison Square Garden Corp. v. Universal Pictures Co., 255 App. Div. 459).

The orders should in all respects be affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements.

Peck, P. J., Grlennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ., concur.

Orders unanimously affirmed, with one bill of $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. [199 Misc. 786.] [See post, pp. 646, 790.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lexmark International, Inc. v. Impression Products, Inc.
816 F.3d 721 (Federal Circuit, 2016)
Flo & Eddie, Inc. v. Sirius XM Radio, Inc.
62 F. Supp. 3d 325 (S.D. New York, 2014)
KatiRoll Co. v. Kati Junction, Inc.
33 F. Supp. 3d 359 (S.D. New York, 2014)
Chicago Board Options Exchange v. International Securities Exchange
2012 IL App (1st) 102228 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 2012)
Barclays Capital Inc. v. Theflyonthewall. Com, Inc.
650 F.3d 876 (Second Circuit, 2011)
Barclays Capital Inc. v. Theflyonthewall. Com
700 F. Supp. 2d 310 (S.D. New York, 2010)
Dow Jones & Company, Inc. v. International Securities Exchange, Inc., and Options Clearing Corporation, the McGraw Companies, Inc. v. International Securities Exchange, Inc., Docket No. 05-4812-Cv. Docket No. 05-4972-Cv
451 F.3d 295 (Second Circuit, 2006)
Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Jamelis Grocery, Inc.
378 F. Supp. 2d 448 (S.D. New York, 2005)
Sioux Biochemical, Inc. v. Cargill, Inc.
410 F. Supp. 2d 785 (N.D. Iowa, 2005)
Capitol Records, Inc. v. Naxos of America, Inc.
830 N.E.2d 250 (New York Court of Appeals, 2005)
Bangkok Crafts Corp. v. Capitolo Di San Pietro in Vaticano
331 F. Supp. 2d 247 (S.D. New York, 2004)
Norbrook Laboratories Ltd. v. G.C. Hanford Manufacturing Co.
297 F. Supp. 2d 463 (N.D. New York, 2003)
Excellus Health Plan, Inc. v. Tran
287 F. Supp. 2d 167 (W.D. New York, 2003)
Gucci America, Inc. v. Duty Free Apparel, Ltd.
277 F. Supp. 2d 269 (S.D. New York, 2003)
QSP, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
773 A.2d 906 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2001)
National Basketball Ass'n v. Sports Team Analysis & Tracking Systems, Inc.
931 F. Supp. 1124 (S.D. New York, 1996)
Michael Anthony Jewelers, Inc. v. Peacock Jewelry, Inc.
795 F. Supp. 639 (S.D. New York, 1992)
Greenblatt v. Prescription Plan Services Corp.
783 F. Supp. 814 (S.D. New York, 1992)
Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. Super Scale Models, Ltd. And Charles C. Merzbach
934 F.2d 135 (Seventh Circuit, 1991)
Diversified Marketing, Inc. v. Estee Lauder, Inc.
705 F. Supp. 128 (S.D. New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
279 A.D. 632, 107 N.Y.S.2d 795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metropolitan-opera-assn-v-wagner-nichols-recorder-corp-nyappdiv-1951.