Miller v. United States
This text of 422 U.S. 1025 (Miller v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that any state or federal ban on, or regu[1026]*1026lation of, obscenity is prohibited by the Constitution, Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 508-514 (1957) (Douglas, J., dissenting); Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15, 42-47 (1973) (Douglas, J., dissenting); Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70-73 (1973) (Douglas, J., dissenting), would grant certiorari and summarily reverse the judgment. Reported below: 507 F. 2d 1100.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
422 U.S. 1025, 95 S. Ct. 2620, 45 L. Ed. 2d 683, 1975 U.S. LEXIS 2048, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-united-states-scotus-1975.