Marvin Miller and Covina Publishing, Inc., a Corporation Doing Business as Collector's Publication v. United States

507 F.2d 1100, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 5861
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedNovember 29, 1974
Docket23-935
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 507 F.2d 1100 (Marvin Miller and Covina Publishing, Inc., a Corporation Doing Business as Collector's Publication v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marvin Miller and Covina Publishing, Inc., a Corporation Doing Business as Collector's Publication v. United States, 507 F.2d 1100, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 5861 (9th Cir. 1974).

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The decision and opinion of this court affirming convictions for having mailed obscene matter in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1461, and for having transported obscene matter in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1462, was dated September 16, 1970, and reported in 431 F.2d 655 (9th Cir. 1970). The Supreme Court, on June 25, 1973, vacated that judgment and remanded the cause to this court for reconsideration in the light of Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15, 93 S.Ct. 2607, 37 L.Ed.2d 419 (1973), and related cases. 413 U.S. 913, 93 S.Ct. 3030, 37 L.Ed.2d 1022 (1973).

*1101 Subsequent proceedings have kept the case in litigation. Most recently it has been returned by the court en banc to the original panel for disposition. We now reaffirm the convictions and adopt our previously reported opinion in 431 F.2d 655, on the authority of Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15, 93 S.Ct. 2607, 37 L.Ed.2d 419 (1973) and Hamling v. United States, 418 U.S. 87, 94 S.Ct. 2887, 41 L.Ed.2d 590 (1974).

We described the materials in our opinion, 431 F.2d at 658, and held that they were constitutionally obscene under the tests then prevailing. We find they are equally obscene under the tests of Miller v. California, supra, and Hamling v. United States, supra. We have considered the issues tendered by appellants in their rebriefing of the issues in the light of Miller and Hamling. We find that the arguments have been foreclosed to them by Hamling or are frivolous, e. g., that a conviction and incarceration would constitute cruel and unusual punishment.

The judgment is reaffirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller v. United States
422 U.S. 1025 (Supreme Court, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
507 F.2d 1100, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 5861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marvin-miller-and-covina-publishing-inc-a-corporation-doing-business-as-ca9-1974.