Miller v. United States
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7965
KARENAZO MILLER, a/k/a Deshaun Bostic,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; A. F. BEELER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-04-715-H)
Submitted: May 12, 2005 Decided: May 17, 2005
Before TRAXLER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Karenazo Miller, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Karenazo Miller appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) motion. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Miller v. United States, No. CA-04-715-H (E.D.N.C. Oct.
28, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miller v. United States (Miller v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.