Miller v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Miller v. United States

131 F. App'x 425

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 17, 2005·No. No. 04-7965·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Karenazo Miller appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Miller v. United States, No. CA-04-715-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 28, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Karenazo Miller appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Miller v. United States, No. CA-04-715-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 28, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Miller v. United States, 131 F. App'x 425 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

131 F. App'x 425 (Miller v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related