Miller v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Miller v. United States

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 17, 2005

Docket04-7965

StatusUnpublished

This text of Miller v. United States (Miller v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. United States, (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7965

KARENAZO MILLER, a/k/a Deshaun Bostic,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; A. F. BEELER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-04-715-H)

Submitted: May 12, 2005 Decided: May 17, 2005

Before TRAXLER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Karenazo Miller, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Karenazo Miller appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) motion. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Miller v. United States, No. CA-04-715-H (E.D.N.C. Oct.

28, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI