Miller v. State

Ohio Supreme Court

Miller v. State

95 Ohio St. 3d 1216

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 22, 2002·No. No. 2001-1084·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

Moyer, C.J., Grady, Pfeifer, Harsha and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., dissents. F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. Thomas J. Grady, J., of the Second Appellate District, sitting for Resnick, J. William H. Harsha III, of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting for Cook, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

Moyer, C.J., Grady, Pfeifer, Harsha and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., dissents. F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. Thomas J. Grady, J., of the Second Appellate District, sitting for Resnick, J. William H. Harsha III, of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting for Cook, J.

Miller v. State, 95 Ohio St. 3d 1216 (Ohio 2002).

Pincite

95 Ohio St. 3d 1216 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related