Miller v. State

157 So. 3d 364, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 810, 2015 WL 276446
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Miller v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 2121
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 23, 2015·No. No. 5D14-4154·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The lower court denied Appellant’s post-conviction motion, which challenged the legality of his sentence on Count IV. The State concedes error because the oral pronouncement of a sixteen-year sentence on Count IV, involving a second-degree felony, exceeds the statutory maximum of fifteen years. Although the parties are technically correct, because the written sentencing order correctly imposes a fifteen-year sentence on Count IV, remand is unnecessary. The oral pronouncement of a sixteen-year sentence on Count IV is stricken, and the written sentence is affirmed without modification.

AFFIRMED.

TORPY, C.J., COHEN and BERGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. State, 157 So. 3d 364, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 810, 2015 WL 276446 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

157 So. 3d 364 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.