Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Miller v. State

Miller v. State

980 So. 2d 546, 2008 WL 1734522
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Miller v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 912 So. 2d 1282 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 16, 2008·No. 4D08-640·Published

Opinion

980 So.2d 546 (2008)

Morris MILLER, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D08-640.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 16, 2008.
Rehearing Denied May 23, 2008.

Morris Miller, South Bay, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. On appellant's third claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel for advising him to reject a plea offer and to take his case to trial instead, we certify conflict with the Third District's decisions in Gomez v. State, 832 So.2d 793 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002), and Sharpe v. State, 861 So.2d 483 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). See Morgan v. State, 941 So.2d 1198 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006), rev. granted, 956 So.2d 456 (Fla.2007).

KLEIN, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. State, 980 So. 2d 546, 2008 WL 1734522 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

980 So. 2d 546 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sharpe v. State
861 So. 2d 483 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Morgan v. State
941 So. 2d 1198 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Gomez v. State
832 So. 2d 793 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Lightbourne v. State
956 So. 2d 456 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2007)