Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Miller v. State

Miller v. State

918 So. 2d 406, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 470, 2006 WL 140538
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Miller v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 852 So. 2d 904 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 20, 2006·No. No. 5D05-4452·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

William Charles Miller has filed a petition seeking belated appeal pursuant to rule 9.141(c), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. Said petition is legally insufficient since it contains no statement by Miller that the petition was made under oath or penalty of perjury. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(3)F. Accordingly, the petition is denied without prejudice to Miller to refile a legally sufficient petition.

DENIED without prejudice.

SHARP, W., PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. State, 918 So. 2d 406, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 470, 2006 WL 140538 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

918 So. 2d 406 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.