Miller v. State
Opinion
We affirm the finding of the trial court that Mr. Miller willfully and substantially violated his probation. See Hightower v. State, 529 So.2d 726 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). We must remand, however, for the trial court to enter a written order documenting the specific conditions of probation that Mr. Miller violated. See Remich v. State, 696 So.2d 1270 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). On remand, as contended by the appellant and as conceded by the State, Mr. Miller’s sentence must be corrected to reflect that he is to serve the suspended portion of his sentence on count II, a term of one year rather than thirty months.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
711 So. 2d 1357 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.