Miller v. State

661 So. 2d 422, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 10909, 1995 WL 610617
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 18, 1995·No. No. 95-224·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Fotopoulos v. State, 608 So.2d 784 (Fla.1992), cert, denied, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 2377, 124 L.Ed.2d 282 (1993); see Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 278, 130 L.Ed.2d 195 (1994); Sweat v. State, 570 So.2d 1111 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Peek v. Wainmight, 393 So.2d 1175 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. State, 661 So. 2d 422, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 10909, 1995 WL 610617 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

661 So. 2d 422 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Metropolitan Dade County v. EDOL CORPORATION
661 So. 2d 422 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)