Miller v. State

702 So. 2d 311, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14112, 1997 WL 777401
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Miller v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 667 So. 2d 325
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 19, 1997·No. No. 97-3052·Published

Opinion

W. SHARP, Judge.

We summarily deny Miller’s petition for writ of certiorari to review the trial court’s oral denial of Miller’s motion for a protective order to quash an investigatory subpoena of his medical records. The state sought to subpoena the toxicology reports, which may indicate Miller’s blood alcohol level, after he was involved as a driver in an accident involving a fatality. In addition to the fact that there is no written order to be reviewed in this case, we think Hunter v. State, 639 So.2d 72 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 649 So.2d 233 (Fla.1994) establishes the propriety of such a narrowly tailored investigative subpoena in a similar case. The state produced ample evidence demonstrating the relevance of Mil[312]*312ler’s medical records in this case and the subpoena was to be narrowly tailored. Therefore, Miller failed to establish any departure from the essential requirements of law. We also deny Miller’s motion for stay in this court as moot.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari DENIED.

COBB and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. State, 702 So. 2d 311, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14112, 1997 WL 777401 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

702 So. 2d 311 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hunter v. State
639 So. 2d 72 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)