Miller v. State
700 So. 2d 101, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11438, 1997 WL 611558
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Miller v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 667 So. 2d 325 →
Opinion
After a careful review of the entire record in this case, we reject the appellant’s argument that his conviction herein was barred by collateral estoppel. Nevertheless, we reverse the appellant’s conviction and remand this ease to the trial court for a new trial because the record does not reveal that the appellant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to a trial by jury. See State v. Upton, 658 So.2d 86 (Fla.1995).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miller v. State, 700 So. 2d 101, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11438, 1997 WL 611558 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).
700 So. 2d 101 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Upton
658 So. 2d 86 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)