Miller v. State

693 So. 2d 598, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1822, 1997 WL 91369
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Miller v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 636 So. 2d 144
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 5, 1997·No. No. 95-01625·Published

Opinion

BLUE, Judge.

Steven Miller appeals his convictions for four counts of capital sexual battery and one count of lewd fondling. We find merit only in his argument that the State failed to produce sufficient evidence to support the lewd fondling conviction. “[A] defendant’s confession to a crime cannot be the sole basis for that defendant’s conviction for that crime; there must be prima facie evidence of the crime charged independent of the defendant’s admission.” Johnson v. State, 569 So.2d 872, 873 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990), review denied, 581 So.2d 167 (Fla.1991). Accordingly, we reverse the lewd fondling conviction. In all other respects, we affirm.

PARKER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. State, 693 So. 2d 598, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1822, 1997 WL 91369 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

693 So. 2d 598 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. State
569 So. 2d 872 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)