Miller v. Spicer Mfg. Co.
This text of 159 Ohio St. (N.S.) 571 (Miller v. Spicer Mfg. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is apparent from the order of the Industrial Commission, quoted in plaintiff’s petition, that the claim plaintiff is now presenting is for a new and distinct injury, for which no application for compensation was made within the two-year period prescribed by Section 1465-72», General Code.
The trial court was correct in sustaining the demurrer and rendering judgment for defendants. The reversal of that judgment by the Court of Appeals was error. State, ex rel. Bernhardt, v. Industrial Commission, 127 Ohio St., 582, 190 N. E., 224, approved and followed, and Kaiser v. Industrial Commission, 136 Ohio St., 440, 26 N. E. (2d), 449, overruled.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and that of the Court of Common Pleas affirmed.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
159 Ohio St. (N.S.) 571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-spicer-mfg-co-ohio-1953.