Miller v. Rossiter
This text of 125 Misc. 80 (Miller v. Rossiter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The action was for brokerage commission earned in procuring a purchaser ready, willing and able to buy on defendant’s terms. A contract of sale was entered into. Immediately thereafter the broker made an agreement to wait for the payment of his commission “ when, as and if title closes.” Objections were made to the title and by mutual agreement the contract was rescinded; the money paid on account returned to the purchaser and the defendants paid the expenses incurred by the purchaser.
The brokerage commission, in this case, was earned when the contract was entered into. The agreement made by the broker was without consideration and unenforcible. (Reis Co. v. Zimmerli, 224 N. Y. 351.)
Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to the appellant to abide the event.
All concur; present, Guy, Wasservogel and Glennon, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
125 Misc. 80, 209 N.Y.S. 767, 1925 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-rossiter-nyappterm-1925.