Miller v. Pacific Pipeline Construction Co.

291 P.2d 534, 138 Cal. App. 2d 187, 1955 Cal. App. LEXIS 1303
California Court of Appeal·Decided December 27, 1955·No. Civ. No. 21287·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

MOORE, P. J.

Appeal from a judgment denying injunctive relief to plaintiffs Miller, Kukta and Silberman, who alleged that a public road contiguous to their several parcels of land had been fenced in by respondent to their detriment; and from the order denying their motion for a new trial. The latter is nonappealable. Inasmuch as the appeal is based solely upon the judgment roll, we shall proceed at once to set forth the pertinent findings and conclusions here under scrutiny. In substance, they follow :

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. Pacific Pipeline Construction Co., 291 P.2d 534, 138 Cal. App. 2d 187, 1955 Cal. App. LEXIS 1303 (Cal. Ct. App. 1955).

291 P.2d 534 (Miller v. Pacific Pipeline Construction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hearst Publishing Co. v. Abounader
196 Cal. App. 2d 49 (California Court of Appeal, 1961)
Thornton v. Stevenson
185 Cal. App. 2d 708 (California Court of Appeal, 1960)