Miller v. Pacific Pipeline Construction Co.

291 P.2d 534, 138 Cal. App. 2d 187, 1955 Cal. App. LEXIS 1303
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedDecember 27, 1955
DocketCiv. No. 21287
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 291 P.2d 534 (Miller v. Pacific Pipeline Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller v. Pacific Pipeline Construction Co., 291 P.2d 534, 138 Cal. App. 2d 187, 1955 Cal. App. LEXIS 1303 (Cal. Ct. App. 1955).

Opinion

MOORE, P. J.

Appeal from a judgment denying injunctive relief to plaintiffs Miller, Kukta and Silberman, who alleged that a public road contiguous to their several parcels of land had been fenced in by respondent to their detriment; and from the order denying their motion for a new trial. The latter is nonappealable. Inasmuch as the appeal is based solely upon the judgment roll, we shall proceed at once to set forth the pertinent findings and conclusions here under scrutiny. In substance, they follow :

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hearst Publishing Co. v. Abounader
196 Cal. App. 2d 49 (California Court of Appeal, 1961)
Thornton v. Stevenson
185 Cal. App. 2d 708 (California Court of Appeal, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
291 P.2d 534, 138 Cal. App. 2d 187, 1955 Cal. App. LEXIS 1303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-pacific-pipeline-construction-co-calctapp-1955.