Miller v. Nelson
This text of 550 So. 2d 1193 (Miller v. Nelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioner seeks mandamus to compel the trial court to enter a final judgment so that he may appeal a judgment for costs 1 entered against him after an adverse jury verdict.
A jury verdict is not an appeal-able order. McGrew v. State, 508 So.2d 727 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987). Likewise, a judgment awarding costs after a jury verdict is not an appealable order. First National Bank of Lake City v. Landress, 102 Fla. 840, 136 So. 469 (1931); American Soda Fountain Co. v. Plaza Marina, 102 Fla. 877, 136 So. 469 (1931); Hall v. Patterson, 45 Fla. 353, 33 So. 982 (1903). Costs are only an incident to a right which is adjudicated, and as such, can not be appealed where there is no finality to the judgment. Finality is attained by adjudication.
The writ is issued and the trial judge is directed to enter final judgment, thereby enabling the petitioner to pursue his appeal.
PETITION GRANTED; WRIT ISSUED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
550 So. 2d 1193, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2545, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6098, 1989 WL 129809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-nelson-fladistctapp-1989.