First Natl. Bk. of Lake City v. Landress

136 So. 469, 102 Fla. 840
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided August 7, 1931·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— -In this case there was a verdict for the defendant and thereupon a judgment was entered in favor of defendant for costs only.

In Hall vs. Patterson, 45 Fla. 353, 33 Sou. 982, it was held:

“A judgment for costs alone, the merits not being adjudicated, though entered for defendant after the jury have found a verdict in his favor, is not such final judgment as will support a writ of error.”

See also C. W. Zaring & Co. vs. Humphreys, 68 Fla. 6, 65 Sou. 665; American Soda Fountain Company vs. Plaza Marina, Inc., filed at this term of the Court.

The writ of error should be dismissed and it is so ordered.

Dismissed.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur. Ellis and Terrell, J.J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

First Natl. Bk. of Lake City v. Landress, 136 So. 469, 102 Fla. 840 (Fla. 1931).

136 So. 469 (First Natl. Bk. of Lake City v. Landress) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller v. Nelson
550 So. 2d 1193 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Ferrara v. Jordan
134 Cal. App. Supp. 2d 917 (California Court of Appeal, 1955)
Ferrara v. Jordan
134 Cal. App. 2d 917 (Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California, 1955)