Miller v. Miller

339 S.W.3d 519, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 383
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Miller v. Miller. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 555
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 22, 2011·No. ED 94837, ED 94899·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Walter Miller, Jr. and Denise Kerley (collectively, Appellants) appeal from the *520 trial court’s judgment that found in favor of Margaret Miller and John Miller in Appellants’ trust-contest action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude that the trial court’s finding is supported by substantial evidence, Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976), and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding certain evidence, Eckelkamp v. Burlington N. Santa Fe Ry. Co., 298 S.W.3d 546, 550 (Mo.App. E.D.2009); Goede v. Aerojet General Corp., 143 S.W.3d 14, 23 (Mo.App. E.D.2004). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2010).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. Miller, 339 S.W.3d 519, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 383 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

339 S.W.3d 519 (Miller v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goede v. Aerojet General Corp.
143 S.W.3d 14 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2004)
Murphy v. Carron
536 S.W.2d 30 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1976)
Eckelkamp v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co.
298 S.W.3d 546 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)