Miller v. Miller

Missouri Court of Appeals

Miller v. Miller

109 S.W.3d 224, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1037, 2003 WL 21488886

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Miller v. Miller. Read the opinion of the Court — 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 195 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 30, 2003·No. No. ED 80397·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Norman Miller (“Husband”) appeals the trial court’s judgment awarding Kathy Miller (“Wife”) an undivided one-half interest in both parties’ pensions, ordering Husband to not take any action to reduce his retirement benefit and adopting Wife’s appraisal of the couple’s home.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Norman Miller (“Husband”) appeals the trial court’s judgment awarding Kathy Miller (“Wife”) an undivided one-half interest in both parties’ pensions, ordering Husband to not take any action to reduce his retirement benefit and adopting Wife’s appraisal of the couple’s home.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Miller v. Miller, 109 S.W.3d 224, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1037, 2003 WL 21488886 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

109 S.W.3d 224 (Miller v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.