Miller v. Miller

Missouri Court of Appeals

Miller v. Miller

71 S.W.3d 245, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 615, 2002 WL 453076

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 26, 2002

DocketNo. ED 78754

StatusPublished

This text of 71 S.W.3d 245 (Miller v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. Miller, 71 S.W.3d 245, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 615, 2002 WL 453076 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Husband, Danny Miller, appeals from the decree of dissolution of his marriage to wife, Charlene Miller, challenging the amount of child support the court ordered him to pay.

We have reviewed the record on appeal and find that the judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Husband, Danny Miller, appeals from the decree of dissolution of his marriage to wife, Charlene Miller, challenging the amount of child support the court ordered him to pay.

We have reviewed the record on appeal and find that the judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 S.W.3d 245, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 615, 2002 WL 453076, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-miller-moctapp-2002.