Miller v. Miller Electric Manufacturing Co.
508 So. 2d 732, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8200
Opinion
Affirmed on the authority of Pullum v. Cincinnati, Inc., 476 So.2d 657 (Fla.1985); Coggins v. Clark Equipment Co., 503 So.2d 982 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); Mathis v. Foote Steele Corp., 502 So.2d 947 (Fla. 5th [733] DCA 1987); Pait v. Ford Motor Company, 500 So.2d 743 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miller v. Miller Electric Manufacturing Co., 508 So. 2d 732, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8200 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).
508 So. 2d 732 (Miller v. Miller Electric Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pullum v. Cincinnati, Inc.
476 So. 2d 657 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
Pait v. Ford Motor Co.
500 So. 2d 743 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Mathis v. Foote Steel Corp.
502 So. 2d 947 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Coggins v. Clark Equipment Co.
503 So. 2d 982 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)