Coggins v. Clark Equipment Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Coggins v. Clark Equipment Co.

503 So. 2d 982, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 750, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12055

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 12, 1987·No. No. 86-631·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment in a products liability case. The question is whether the statute of limitations (repose) bars recovery. § 95.031(2), Fla.Stat. (1985). The answer must be that it does. Pullum v. Cincinnati, Inc., 476 So.2d 657 (Fla.), reh’g den., 482 So.2d 1352 (Fla.1985); American Lib. Ins. Co. v. West and Conyers, Architects & Engineers, 491 So.2d 573 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Small v. Niagara Machine & Tool Works, 502 So.2d 943 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Pait v. Ford Motor Company, 500 So.2d 743 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).

AFFIRMED.

UPCHURCH, C.J., and COWART, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment in a products liability case. The question is whether the statute of limitations (repose) bars recovery. § 95.031(2), Fla.Stat. (1985). The answer must be that it does. Pullum v. Cincinnati, Inc., 476 So.2d 657 (Fla.), reh’g den., 482 So.2d 1352 (Fla.1985); American Lib. Ins. Co. v. West and Conyers, Architects & Engineers, 491 So.2d 573 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Small v. Niagara Machine & Tool Works, 502 So.2d 943 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Pait v. Ford Motor Company, 500 So.2d 743 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).

AFFIRMED.

UPCHURCH, C.J., and COWART, J., concur.

Coggins v. Clark Equipment Co., 503 So. 2d 982, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 750, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12055 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

503 So. 2d 982 (Coggins v. Clark Equipment Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related