Coggins v. Clark Equipment Co.

503 So. 2d 982, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 750, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12055
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 12, 1987
DocketNo. 86-631
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 503 So. 2d 982 (Coggins v. Clark Equipment Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coggins v. Clark Equipment Co., 503 So. 2d 982, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 750, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12055 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment in a products liability case. The question is whether the statute of limitations (repose) bars recovery. § 95.031(2), Fla.Stat. (1985). The answer must be that it does. Pullum v. Cincinnati, Inc., 476 So.2d 657 (Fla.), reh’g den., 482 So.2d 1352 (Fla.1985); American Lib. Ins. Co. v. West and Conyers, Architects & Engineers, 491 So.2d 573 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Small v. Niagara Machine & Tool Works, 502 So.2d 943 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Pait v. Ford Motor Company, 500 So.2d 743 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).

AFFIRMED.

UPCHURCH, C.J., and COWART, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Patino v. Cessna Aircraft Co.
509 So. 2d 1161 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Miller v. Miller Electric Manufacturing Co.
508 So. 2d 732 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
503 So. 2d 982, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 750, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12055, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coggins-v-clark-equipment-co-fladistctapp-1987.