Miller v. McKinnon

29 S.E. 467, 103 Ga. 553, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 405
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 26, 1897·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Cobb, J.

1. Where a writing containing evidence material in the trial of a case is in the possession of a person not a party, who is heyond the jurisdiction of the court, secondary evidence of the contents of such writing is admissible. Bowden v. Achor, 95 Ga. 244, 260.

2. The evidence as to the terms of the contract between the plaintiff and the defendant being conflicting, the court erred in directing a verdict.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. McKinnon, 29 S.E. 467, 103 Ga. 553, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 405 (Ga. 1897).

29 S.E. 467 (Miller v. McKinnon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Florida Coca Cola Bottling Co. v. Ricker
71 S.E. 734 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1911)
McConnell Bros. v. Slappey
67 S.E. 440 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1910)