Miller v. McKinnon

29 S.E. 467, 103 Ga. 553, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 405
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 26, 1897
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 29 S.E. 467 (Miller v. McKinnon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller v. McKinnon, 29 S.E. 467, 103 Ga. 553, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 405 (Ga. 1897).

Opinion

Cobb, J.

1. Where a writing containing evidence material in the trial of a case is in the possession of a person not a party, who is heyond the jurisdiction of the court, secondary evidence of the contents of such writing is admissible. Bowden v. Achor, 95 Ga. 244, 260.

2. The evidence as to the terms of the contract between the plaintiff and the defendant being conflicting, the court erred in directing a verdict.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Florida Coca Cola Bottling Co. v. Ricker
71 S.E. 734 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1911)
McConnell Bros. v. Slappey
67 S.E. 440 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 S.E. 467, 103 Ga. 553, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-mckinnon-ga-1897.