Miller v. . Latta

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Miller v. . Latta

90 S.E. 517, 172 N.C. 498, 1916 N.C. LEXIS 326

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 15, 1916·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

AlleN, J.

The judgment appealed from shows that the judge of the Superior Court had the benefit of argument and that he carefully considered the evidence taken by the referee, and when this course is pursued his findings of fact are conclusive upon us, in the absence of an exception that there is no evidence to support the finding, and we find no such exception. Wynn v. Bullock, 154 N. C., 882; Culver v. Jennings, 157 N. C., 565.

We have, however, examined the record and are of opinion there is evidence to sustain the finding as to the order of $860, and to support the contention of the plaintiffs that the order of 21 July, 1911, for $854.84 was not given in substitution for the first order.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

AlleN, J.

The judgment appealed from shows that the judge of the Superior Court had the benefit of argument and that he carefully considered the evidence taken by the referee, and when this course is pursued his findings of fact are conclusive upon us, in the absence of an exception that there is no evidence to support the finding, and we find no such exception. Wynn v. Bullock, 154 N. C., 882; Culver v. Jennings, 157 N. C., 565.

We have, however, examined the record and are of opinion there is evidence to sustain the finding as to the order of $860, and to support the contention of the plaintiffs that the order of 21 July, 1911, for $854.84 was not given in substitution for the first order.

Affirmed.

Miller v. . Latta, 90 S.E. 517, 172 N.C. 498, 1916 N.C. LEXIS 326 (N.C. 1916).

Pincite

90 S.E. 517 (Miller v. . Latta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related