Culver v. Jennings

157 N.C. 565
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 6, 1911·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee Cubiak.

All tbe exceptions to tbe referee’s report except one are to bis findings of fact. As sucb findings upon examination were approved and adopted by tbe judge of tbe Superior Court, and as there is some evidence to support tbem, tbe action of bis Honor will not be reviewed by tbis Court.

Tbe only exception to any conclusion of law wbicb we find in tbe record presents tbe question as to wbetber tbe plaintiff is chargeable with costs and áttorney’s fees as damages for tbe breach of warranty of title to land set up in bis counterclaim.

Tbis is expressly decided in Wiggins v. Pender, 132 N. C., 628; Jones v. Balsley, 154 N. C., 61.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Culver v. Jennings, 157 N.C. 565 (N.C. 1911).

157 N.C. 565 (Culver v. Jennings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller v. . Latta
90 S.E. 517 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1916)