Miller v. Kennedy
This text of 530 P.2d 334 (Miller v. Kennedy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We granted a petition for review of the Court of Appeals disposition of issues revolving about the doctrines of res ipsa loquitur and informed consent in a medical malpractice case. Miller v. Kennedy, 11 Wn. App. 272, 522 P.2d 852 (1974), petition for review granted, 84 Wn.2d 1008 (1974).
*152 Our review of the record convinces us that the Court of Appeals did not err in its discussion or disposition of the issues involved. We can add nothing constructive to the well considered opinion of that court and, accordingly, approve and adopt the reasoning thereof.
The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
530 P.2d 334, 85 Wash. 2d 151, 1975 Wash. LEXIS 861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-kennedy-wash-1975.