Miller v. Hubbard-Wray Co.
633 P.2d 1, 53 Or. App. 531
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided August 24, 1981·No. No. 79-210-E-2, CA 18104·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Defendant Hubbard-Wray, Co., in its Petition for Review, points out that our fact statement is in error in stating that the hay baler sold by defendant to plaintiff was later returned to defendant and that defendant had accepted return of the baler and sold it. The opinion is modified accordingly.
Reconsideration granted; former opinion adhered to as modified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miller v. Hubbard-Wray Co., 633 P.2d 1, 53 Or. App. 531 (Or. Ct. App. 1981).
633 P.2d 1 (Miller v. Hubbard-Wray Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Oregon Azaleas, Inc. v. Western Farm Service, Inc.
65 F. App'x 101 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)
Miller v. HUBBARD-WRAY CO., INC.
633 P.2d 1 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1981)