Miller v. HUBBARD-WRAY CO., INC.
Opinion
James C. MILLER, Appellant,
v.
HUBBARD-WRAY CO., INC., an Oregon Corporation, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Douglas P. Cushing and Cushing, Haberlach, Hanson & Black, Medford, for petition.
No appearance contra.
Before RICHARDSON, P.J. and THORNTON and VAN HOOMISSEN, JJ.
THORNTON, Judge.
Defendant Hubbard-Wray Co., in its Petition for Review, 52 Or. App. 897, 630 P.2d 880, points out that our fact statement is in error in stating that the hay baler sold by defendant to plaintiff was later returned to defendant and that defendant had accepted return of the baler and sold it. The opinion is modified accordingly.
Reconsideration granted; former opinion adhered to as modified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
633 P.2d 1 (Miller v. HUBBARD-WRAY CO., INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.