Miller v. Heath

7 Cow. 101
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1827·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Curia.

Take your motion, on paying the costs of the demurrer, and of this motion. It is not of course, on overruling a frivolous demurrer, to allow the party to withdraw it and plead. But it has often been done where the attor[102] nev demurred in good faith; and a defence on the *merits J ° * . _ is sworn to. An application for this, is most properly Drought forward in the form of a non-enumerated motion, on notice.

Eule accordingly.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. Heath, 7 Cow. 101 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1827).

7 Cow. 101 (Miller v. Heath) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McNeil v. Board of Supervisors
131 A.D. 126 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)
J.A. R.A. Reid v. Prov. Journal Co.
37 A. 637 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1897)
Piper v. Hoard
3 N.Y.S. 842 (New York Supreme Court, 1888)
United States v. Leverich
9 F. 481 (S.D. New York, 1881)
Mayberry v. Brackett
72 Me. 102 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1881)
Fisher v. . Gould
81 N.Y. 228 (New York Court of Appeals, 1880)
Darrow v. Miller
5 How. Pr. 247 (New York Supreme Court, 1850)