Piper v. Hoard

56 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 611
New York Supreme Court·Decided September 15, 1888·Published

Opinion

Order reversed and motion granted so as to allow an answer served to contain tbe second defense in the proposed answer upon payment of the costs of the demurrer, the costs accruing in the General Term upon the demurrer, and the costs in the Court of Appeals upon the appeal and ten dollars costs of opposing the motion, and upon giving a stipulation that the testimony of Catherine Piper, heretofore taken, be read upon the trial; neither party to have costs upon this appeal. Opinion bv

Hardin, P. J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Piper v. Hoard, 56 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 611 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1888).

56 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 611 (Piper v. Hoard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.