Miller v. Cunningham

512 F.3d 98, 2007 WL 4555761
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 28, 2007·No. 06-2334, 07-1002·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinions

ORDER

Appellants/cross-appellees filed a petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc. Appellees/cross-appellants filed a response in opposition to the petition. A member of the Court requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc. The poll failed to produce a majority of the judges in active service in favor of rehearing en banc. Judges Wilkinson and Shedd voted to grant rehearing en banc. Chief Judge Williams and Judges Niemeyer, Michael, [99] Motz, Traxler, King, and Duncan voted to deny rehearing en banc. Judge Gregory did not participate in any consideration of this case.

The Court denies the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc. Judge Wilkinson filed an opinion dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc.

Entered at the direction of Senior Judge Wilkins for the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. Cunningham, 512 F.3d 98, 2007 WL 4555761 (4th Cir. 2007).

512 F.3d 98 (Miller v. Cunningham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Michael Polelle v. Florida Secretary of State
131 F.4th 1201 (Eleventh Circuit, 2025)
Fitzgerald v. Alcorn
285 F. Supp. 3d 922 (W.D. Virginia, 2018)
Crum v. Duran
New Mexico Supreme Court, 2017
Molinari v. Bloomberg
Second Circuit, 2009
Miller v. Cunningham
564 F. Supp. 2d 555 (E.D. Virginia, 2008)
Chadwell v. Lee County School Board
535 F. Supp. 2d 586 (W.D. Virginia, 2008)
Miller v. Cunningham
512 F.3d 98 (Fourth Circuit, 2007)